A young man in Liverpool was wrongfully convicted of assault and sentenced to five years in prison. New evidence emerged, including CCTV footage and an alibi witness, proving his innocence. The case had garnered significant media attention, and the man’s family had spent years fighting to clear his name.
The man, a university student, had been accused of assaulting a stranger in a late-night altercation. Despite maintaining his innocence, he was convicted based on flawed witness testimony and inadequate legal representation. His family tirelessly campaigned for his release, gathering new evidence and raising awareness of the case.
She took on the case, filing an appeal and presenting the new evidence. She highlighted procedural errors in the original trial, including mishandled evidence and inadequate legal representation. Sarah also worked with media outlets to raise awareness of the case and put pressure on the justice system.
Process:
Evidence Review: Sarah reviewed the new evidence, including CCTV footage and witness statements.
Appeal Filing: She filed an appeal with the Liverpool courts.
Media Campaign: Sarah worked with media outlets to raise awareness of the case.
Court Representation: She represented the client in court, presenting the new evidence.
Compensation Claim: After the conviction was overturned, Sarah filed a compensation claim for wrongful imprisonment.
Challenges:
Proving Innocence: The burden of proof was high, requiring compelling new evidence.
Public Perception: The case had attracted significant media attention, making it difficult to manage public opinion.
Legal Hurdles: The appeal process was lengthy and complex, requiring meticulous preparation.
The conviction was overturned, and the man was released from prison. He received £250,000 in compensation for wrongful imprisonment, and the case led to reforms in the handling of evidence in criminal trials.
English 
Arabic